Compare head to head
The comparison grid we would build for a client. Best score in each row is underlined — but read the category first, because comparing a companion vendor to a full-service clinic will mislead you.
Select up to 3 vendors
1 selected
| Vendor | 7.4 Teladoc Health Navigation & orchestration |
|---|---|
| Category | Navigation & orchestration |
| Scores | |
| Clinical rigor | 7.3 |
| Outcomes evidence | 7.0 |
| Cost control | 7.6 |
| Data & reporting | 8.2 |
| Integration | 9.2 |
| Member experience | 6.8 |
| Commercial | |
| PMPM range | $18–$44 |
| Pricing model | PMPM across the full eligible population, bundled with other Teladoc services |
| Performance guarantees | Standard enterprise SLAs; clinical guarantees negotiable |
| Minimum lives | 5,000 |
| Term | 36 months |
| Termination notice | 180 days |
| Clinical | |
| Prescribes | Yes |
| Step therapy | Yes |
| Prior authorization | Yes |
| BMI threshold | Configurable by employer |
| Off-ramp protocol | Chronic-care management continues after weight targets are met |
| Evidence | |
| Evidence level | Vendor-reported |
| Follow-up | Not verified |
| Assessment | |
| Best for | Large enterprises already running Teladoc who want policy control and one contract instead of five. |
| Watch out | Bundled pricing obscures what you actually pay for weight management. Demand the standalone line item before comparing. |
| Verdict | The right structural answer for large, complex employers who value control and integration over member delight. Insist on unbundled pricing so you can actually compare it to specialists. |