Compare head to head
The comparison grid we would build for a client. Best score in each row is underlined — but read the category first, because comparing a companion vendor to a full-service clinic will mislead you.
Select up to 3 vendors
1 selected
| Vendor | 7.5 Vida Health Full-service clinical |
|---|---|
| Category | Full-service clinical |
| Scores | |
| Clinical rigor | 7.6 |
| Outcomes evidence | 7.3 |
| Cost control | 7.2 |
| Data & reporting | 7.7 |
| Integration | 7.8 |
| Member experience | 7.9 |
| Commercial | |
| PMPM range | $38–$78 |
| Pricing model | PMPM on enrolled members, with outcomes-based tiers available |
| Performance guarantees | Clinical and engagement guarantees; commonly 20–30% of fees at risk |
| Minimum lives | 1,000 |
| Term | 24 months |
| Termination notice | 90 days |
| Clinical | |
| Prescribes | Yes |
| Step therapy | Yes |
| Prior authorization | Yes |
| BMI threshold | BMI ≥ 27 |
| Off-ramp protocol | Integrated maintenance with continuing mental health support |
| Evidence | |
| Evidence level | Peer-reviewed observational |
| Follow-up | Retrospective, with follow-up varying by cohort |
| Assessment | |
| Best for | Employers who already see behavioral health and metabolic health as one problem and want a single accountable vendor. |
| Watch out | If you already run a strong EAP or mental health vendor, you are buying overlap. Price the weight-management component alone. |
| Verdict | A thoughtful pick when behavioral health is part of your thesis and you have no strong incumbent. Otherwise you are buying overlap — make them price the weight component standalone. |